<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=229461991482875&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

Working in the cloud comes with many well-documented, high-level benefits including unlimited and completely scalable storage, secure data back-up and fully-flexible access across device and location.

But how do these benefits apply specifically to contract and vendor management? And how can you weigh up the cloud against alternative deployment models?

What is cloud contract management? 

Cloud-based contract management uses intuitive and dedicated SaaS solutions to manage the lifecycle of contracts, rather than using a combination of disparate spreadsheets and offline methods. Cloud contract management can help businesses to unlock greater value.

The Case for Cloud Contract Management

Having a a SaaS contract management solution hosted in the cloud helps solve two of the most common issues associated with contract management:

  1. Centralisation of data
  2. Accessibility of data

The lack of a contract repository software is the first major hurdle for a business wanting to optimise its pool of contracts and vendors.

If contracts are dispersed among different teams and departments and stored in a variety of formats, including hard copy, it makes it practically impossible to determine the scope of all the contracts. This leads to:

  • Missed renewals through lack of available information about key dates
  • An inability to strategise about, or consolidate, contract and vendor spend
  • Gaps in compliance and increased business risk as supplier records aren’t kept up to date
  • Tedious manual work searching for information about contract commitments

These issues can all result in increased costs and greater chance of supply chain failure.

Moving all your contract agreements to a central, cloud-based repository addresses these issues directly by:

  • Displaying a calendar of key dates such as forthcoming renewals, meaning they can be planned for appropriately.
  • Providing visibility over your whole contract database, including costs, categories, and departments
  • Recording compliance against contract records and automating its renewal.
  • Providing delegated access to your wider team, meaning key legal and procurement personnel aren’t tied up with having to find contract agreements on behalf of colleagues.

When it comes to centralisation, the cloud not only assists the staff responsible for contract management access the information, it makes it straightforward for the rest of the business to upload contract documents and keep records up to date.

Additionally, all your contracts are securely backed up, meaning you don’t need to worry about them being lost. This can easily happen if they exist only in hard copy or in personal email accounts of staff, who may subsequently leave the business.

Cloud solutions in general, and Gatekeeper in particular, also simplify collaboration by providing permission-based access and making information accessible on any device, anywhere.

More than other business disciplines, Contract Management is a naturally collaborative process. This applies both internally, with different business areas such as Legal, Finance and Procurement being obliged to work together to progress contract agreements, and externally with the need to work closely with third parties.

As a result, in the cloud is the logical place to store and manage contracts.

Why you should choose saaS contract Management solutions rather than deploy an on-premise solution or build in-house 

Both these options could be viable for your business if you have an engaged and responsive IT Team to support you.

The growth in SaaS businesses over the last ten years has broken down most of the barriers to adoption. Where companies might previously have been strongly sceptical of the idea, SaaS delivered via the cloud is now considered pretty normal.

Objections now would generally only come down to one of two major reasons:

  1. IT/Information Security. If there is an absolute hard requirement for on-premise deployment to meet a security standard.
  2. Cost - if the expected costs of an in-house or on-premise solution are calculated to be sufficiently lower than a SaaS deployment.

Looking first at Security, we can see why certain businesses would be resistant to hosting their data in the cloud. In heavily regulated industries like financial services and healthcare the security standards are justifiably high and the potential financial penalties severe.

Beyond that, the reputational damage for data breaches is becoming so significant now that this can even outweigh the direct financial penalties that might be imposed by a regulatory body.

This is why SaaS companies have to be incredibly focused on their security credentials in order to work with enterprise businesses.

Gatekeeper takes an extremely proactive approach to this area, having achieved ISO 27001 accreditation for Information Security Management, as well as submitting for regular, rigorous security testing by external parties.

Not only does this provide the level of reassurance required for enterprise customers, it also means that smaller, growing businesses benefit from the same high security standards.

The other major objection is cost and it can be that over a particular timeline or in certain cases, that there is a considerable difference between the predicted cost of SaaS and an in-house or on-premise solution.

A typical comparison of costs over time between SaaS and on-premise might look like this:

SaaS vs On-Premise cost comparison - annotated

Looking at this model, depending on your time horizon, the comparative costs could look very different, with the initial spike for on-premise solutions gradually being eroded by the longer term costs of SaaS.

In the following simplified version, you need to assess whether the value of area A is likely to outweigh the value of area B over your chosen timeframe.

SaaS vs On-Premise Cost Comparison - Simple

In simple terms, if A is bigger, then SaaS contract management would be the preferable option, otherwise on-premise could be the way to go.

That said, all you are comparing in this scenario are the flat costs. What this won’t take into account are the comparative ease of management of the two options.

The on-premise solution puts the responsibility for updates and ongoing management in the hands of your IT team. It’s possible that they will be able to provide the consistent level of engagement and responsiveness that you require but more likely is that when it comes to updating that you’ll need to get into a prioritised queue.

For a SaaS solution, updates and enhancements are generally deployed automatically, meaning your version of the solution is always the most up-to-date.

The SaaS model also brings predictability of costs, which can also be of value to growing businesses who need to focus tightly on cash-flow. You also have the ability to scale up as required if your business grows rapidly.

With the on-premise model you may be required to go to the back of the project queue to get your upgrade completed, which could slow your business growth.

Trust the experts

Putting aside the benefits relating to costs, accessibility and centralisation for one minute, the obvious reason for working with a SaaS business is that they’re the experts in their chosen field.

Their solution and team exist solely to solve a particular business problem.

Even if you were to work with a SaaS business that allowed an on-premise deployment of its solution, you would still begin, almost immediately, to diverge from their latest product version.

Compromises would need to be made during the integration and it’s unlikely that the release schedule would coincide with those of the SaaS platform.

This means you wouldn’t be benefiting from the full extent of their expertise and you would increasingly be reliant on your non-specialist IT team to adapt the software.

If you opt for a fully in-house solution built to your internal specifications, the problems are magnified as you’re fully reliant on your IT Team and the requirements drafted by your internal stakeholders.

Naturally, they can’t have the same depth of knowledge about the discipline as those that work day-in, day-out on this particular problem across a large spectrum of businesses.

This therefore becomes a recipe for poor execution and a sub-standard solution.

If you’d like to understand more about how Gatekeeper can help you leverage the Cloud and a SaaS contract management solution, then get in touch today.

Ian Bryce
Ian Bryce

Ian writes on a variety of topics, bringing together his own knowledge and experience with that of industry experts.


Contract Management , Contract Lifecycle Management , Vendor Management , Contract Lifecycle , Contract Management Software , Case Study , Supplier Management , CLM , Contracts , Risk Mitigation , Contract Automation , Contract Management Strategy , Contract Ownership , Risk , Contract Risk Management , Gatekeeper Guides , Legal , Negotiation , Vendor Management Software , COVID-19 , Contract Redlining , Legal Ops , RFP , Workflows , Artificial Intelligence , Business continuity , CLM solutions , Compliance , Contract Repository , Vendor Onboarding , AI , Clause Library , Contract Administration , Contract Management Plans , Contract Managers , Contract Performance , Contract Review , Contract Risk , Electronic Signatures , Excel , Kanban , Metadata , Procurement Strategy , RBAC , Redline , SaaS , Security , Spend Analysis , Supplier Performance , Vendor Portal , collaboration , contract renewals , Clause Template , Contract Approvals , Contract Breach , Contract Governance , Contract Monitoring , Contract Outcomes , Contract Templates , Contract Tracking , Dashboards , Data Fragmentation , Employee Portal , Gatekeeper , IT , KPIs , Obligations Management , Procurement Planning , Scaling Business , Suppler Management Software , Sustainable Procurement , automation , central repository , eSign , time-to-contract , webinar , Australia , BCP , Breach of Contract , Brexit , Business Case , Business Growth , CCPA , CMS , CSR , Categorisation , Certifications , Cloud , Conferences , Confidentiality , Contract Ambiguity , Contract Analysis , Contract Attributes , Contract Community , Contract Disengagement , Contract Disputes , Contract Drafting , Contract Economics , Contract Execution , Contract Management Audit , Contract Obligations , Contract Obscurity , Contract Routing , Contract Stratification , Contract Termination , Contract Value , Contract Volatility , Contract compliance , Contract relevance , Contract relevance review , Contracting Standards , Contracting Standards Review , Data Privacy , Data Sovereignty , Definitions , Digital Transformation , Disputes , ESG , EU , Enterprise , Enterprise Contract Management , FCA , Financial Services , Force Majeure , GDPR , Hotels , ISO , ISO Certification , Implementation , Intergrations , Key Contracts , LegalTech , Measurement , Mergers and Acquisitions , Modern Slavery , NDA , Operations , Parallel Approvals , Partnerships , Pharma , Planning , Port Agency , Pricing , Procurement , RAG Status , Recession Planning , Regulation , Regulatory compliance , Requirements , SOC Reports , SaaStock , Shipping , Spend optimzation , Startups , Technology , Touchless Contracts , Usability , Vendor risk , remote working , vendor centric

Related Content


subscribe to our newsletter


Sign up today to receive the latest GateKeeper content in your inbox.

Subscribe to Email Updates