<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=229461991482875&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

It’s a common scenario that we come across when speaking to prospective customers.

On the one hand they have the option to leverage an existing ERP solution, usually by activating a separate module. Whilst on the other hand they have the option of investing in a separate, specialist contract management solutions and vendor management solutions such as Gatekeeper and ContractNow.

We have a range of customers who have extensive implementations of solutions such as NetSuite and Salesforce, yet who rely on Gatekeeper for their specific contract and vendor management needs.

Our experience tells us that in our case they do this due to the focused nature of our solution and the quality of our supporting services.

More broadly though, it is helpful to consider the relative merits of each option. In some cases, the ERP option will be the correct one so it’s necessary to understand what those circumstances are.

Here, we’ll lay out the key advantages and disadvantages of the ERP to help you work out which option is best suited to you and your business.

What are The Advantages of managing contracts via an ERP?

  • Single solution - large-scale ERP or Service Management Solution implementations can make a number of existing systems redundant and this greatly simplifies IT management and overhead.
  • Training - as part of any Enterprise roll out, training is a must so having an existing solution that most staff will have some level of familiarity with can speed up the time to adoption.
  • Support - IT will be very comfortable supporting the extended solution as it is their core line-of-business application
  • Control - using an existing solution provides IT with overall management and control giving IT leaders comfort and assurance

What are the Disadvantages of managing contracts via an ERP?

  • Simplicity - the contract and vendor management extensions are often limited to a simple database of metadata. This can support basic requirements but a busy legal team, for example, that needs to automate many processes, retain flexibility in their contract data and build out workflows, reports and dashboards to increase efficiency can find themselves limited.
  • Cost - ERP and Enterprise solutions are notoriously expensive, even in non-core areas such as contact management. Modern startups providing purpose-built solutions often provide more features and functionality at a significantly lower price.
  • Customisation - most companies evolving their contract and vendor management requirements will find customisations are required over time. In a dedicated solution, these are often managed as configuration items within the solution as they are common across the customer base. Where non-native contract management solutions require customisation the costs can be intimidating and are often not viable.
  • Prioritisation - busy legal and procurement teams managing active contracts often need support in a time-specific fashion. IT teams managing the whole organisation can struggle to respond to these requests, especially in high-demand periods.
  • IT Resources - securing IT resources for non-core projects can often be a challenge. In larger companies, this normally results in cross-charges to other departments and these can often grow beyond available budgets.
  • Subject Matter Expertise - a specialist contract and vendor management provider manages hundreds of customers with similar needs using subject matter experts within the team. Using internal IT systems often removes this valuable knowledge and resource that can greatly alleviate workload from the key stakeholders both during and post implementation.
  • Focus - A good indicator of this can be to review the company’s website. How prominent is contract management as a solution promoted? The real estate of a marketing site is valuable and so is directly related to the revenue and focus of the company. If there is little or no mention of contract management this is indicative of the focus the company will place on this element of their business.
  • Evolution - the lack of focus on features unique to contract management can result in legal teams or other in-house functions failing to capitalise on features such as OCR and AI that are disrupting the industry. This places the entire organisation at a disadvantage to competitors who are partnered with specialist providers.


ERP solutions will generally offer extensions or ‘add-ons’ to provide contract and vendor management functionality. They are typically simple in nature in comparison to a purpose-built solution such as Gatekeeper, but can hold contract data and provide basic date-based alerts.

As a result, there are situations where the contract and vendor management needs of an organisation are simple and therefore leveraging an existing ERP or Service Management solution can make sense.

Our experience is that companies that seek out a solution such as Gatekeeper have reached the limit of what spreadsheets and email can do for them.

They want an optimised contract management process involving not only clear visibility but also easy collaboration, automation, delegation and the ability to analyse spend effectively.

Gatekeeper also offers native integrations with some of the most commonly-used platforms within businesses. In comparison to an ERP which may have limitations for particular teams or be designed solely for one team, contract management software brings entire businesses together, allowing them to collaborate seamlessly whilst using the tools of their choice. 

That’s where investing in contract management has the edge over the ERP, as it brings the benefits of dedicated industry expertise and solves the problems without compromise. 

You can read more about contract management best practice in our related blogs and find out more about Gatekeeper solutions here.

Patrick O'Connor
Patrick O'Connor

Patrick is CEO of Gatekeeper, with over two decades of contract and commercial negotiation expertise, predominantly in IT and Technology.


Contract Management , Contract Lifecycle Management , Vendor Management , Contract Management Software , Contract Lifecycle , Compliance , Control , Supplier Management , Case Study , Visibility , Contract Risk Management , Vendor Management Software , Contract Management Strategy , Risk Mitigation , Contract Repository , Contract Automation , CLM , Contract Ownership , Contracts , Workflows , Supplier Performance , Supplier Risk , Contract Redlining , Gatekeeper Guides , Legal , Legal Ops , Negotiation , Risk , Vendor Onboarding , COVID-19 , RFP , Third Party Risk Management , Artificial Intelligence , Business continuity , CLM solutions , Contract Managers , Contract Performance , Contract Review , Metadata , Procurement Strategy , Regulatory compliance , SaaS , Supplier Management Software , Supplier Relationships , TPRM , Vendor Portal , Vendor risk , contract renewals , webinar , AI , Clause Library , Contract Administration , Contract Management Plans , Contract Monitoring , Contract Risk , Contract Templates , Contract Visibility , Contract compliance , Electronic Signatures , Excel , Kanban , RBAC , Recession Planning , Redline , Regulation , SOC Reports , Security , Sustainable Procurement , collaboration , Audit preparedness , Audit readiness , Audits , Business Case , Clause Template , Contract Approvals , Contract Breach , Contract Governance , Contract Management Audit , Contract Management Automation , Contract Management Features , Contract Obligations , Contract Outcomes , Contract Tracking , Contract Value , Contract and vendor management , Dashboards , Data Fragmentation , Employee Portal , FCA , Gatekeeper , ISO Certification , IT , KPIs , Legal automation , LegalTech , Obligations Management , Procurement , Procurement Planning , Scaling Business , Spend Analysis , Standard Contractual Clauses , Suppler Management Software , Touchless Contracts , automation , central repository , eSign , time-to-contract , Australia , BCP , Breach of Contract , Brexit , Business Growth , CCPA , CMS , CPRA 2020 , CSR , Categorisation , Centralisation , Certifications , Cloud , Conferences , Confidentiality , Contract Ambiguity , Contract Analysis , Contract Attributes , Contract Challenges , Contract Change Management , Contract Community , Contract Disengagement , Contract Disputes , Contract Drafting , Contract Economics , Contract Execution , Contract Management Optimisation , Contract Management pain points , Contract Negotiation , Contract Obscurity , Contract Reminder Software , Contract Reporting , Contract Routing , Contract Stratification , Contract Termination , Contract Volatility , Contract relevance , Contract relevance review , Contracting Standards , Contracting Standards Review , Data Privacy , Data Sovereignty , Definitions , Digital Transformation , Disputes , Due Diligence , ESG , EU , Enterprise , Enterprise Contract Management , Financial Services , Financial Stability , Force Majeure , GDPR , Hotels , ISO , Implementation , Integrations , Intergrations , Key Contracts , Measurement , Mergers and Acquisitions , Microsoft Word , Modern Slavery , NDA , NetSuite , Operations , Parallel Approvals , Partnerships , Pharma , Planning , Port Agency , Pricing , RAG Status , Redlining , Redlining solutions , Requirements , SaaStock , Shipping , Spend optimzation , Startups , SuiteApp , SuiteWorld , Supplier Cataloguing , Technology , Usability , Vendor risk management , Voice of the CEO , contract reminders , document automation , remote working , success hours , vendor centric

Related Content


subscribe to our newsletter


Sign up today to receive the latest GateKeeper content in your inbox.

Subscribe to Email Updates