<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=229461991482875&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Skip to content
Back
Why Monitoring Vendor Cyber Security Posture Is Critical for Aged Care Resilience
8:02

In 2025, over 1,800 providers in Australia’s aged care sector remain highly exposed to cyber threats. Many are small or not-for-profit, with lean IT budgets and legacy systems that heighten their vulnerability.

The Aged Care sector is now firmly in the cyber crosshairs: 

  • 10x More Attacks: CyberCX reported in 2025 that aged care and other non-hospital providers face ten times more cyber attacks than hospitals
  • TPG Aged Care (2024): Attackers exfiltrated ~65GB of data from a Perth-based provider and LockBit later listed the data on a public leak site. The organisation notified ACSC and OAIC and restored systems, but the incident shows how quickly third-party weaknesses can escalate.
  • St Vincent’s Health (2023): confirmed data theft, requiring extensive investigation and remediation. Cyber criminals removed data from Australia’s largest not-for-profit hospital network. St Vincent’s engaged external experts and notified regulators; after forensics, it reported no evidence of sensitive personal information stolen. 

Attackers are actively exploiting the weakest links in the aged care ecosystem: vendors and service providers that underpin daily operations.

 

The true cost of poor cyber security posture 

Ransomware is no longer an abstract cyber threat - it’s a frontline aged care issue.

The reality is stark: aged care providers are no longer simply managing IT risks. They are defending trust, compliance, and the very continuity of care.

Inaction risks fines and financial leakage. It also risks reputational damage and a collapse in confidence that can take years to rebuild.

The organisations that will stand resilient are those that treat cyber risk as a board-level priority, embedding continuous oversight of every vendor, contract, and third-party touchpoint into their operating model.

Why Aged Care Is Especially Vulnerable to cyber Attacks

Three systemic issues magnify cyber risk for the Aged Care sector in Australia:

  • Resource-constrained oversight. Budgets are tight, governance teams are lean, and responsibility for third-party risk is often fragmented across Legal, Procurement, Risk, and Compliance, leaving no one function with the full picture.
  • Legacy contracts and systems. Outdated agreements and ageing technologies lock providers into arrangements that expose vulnerabilities long since patched elsewhere.
  • Shared vendor concentration. Heavy reliance on the same ICT and managed service suppliers across the sector means a single breach can cascade across multiple facilities, impacting care continuity.

Cyber Security Regulations for APAC

The Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission (ACQSC) has made its expectations clear: boards and executives must actively govern technology and cyber risk, including third-party exposure.

The aged care regulatory environment now raises the bar:

Boards must be ready to produce audit-ready evidence of supply-chain cyber control on demand.

Continuous Vendor Monitoring: Protecting Resident Care From Cyber Disruption

Aged care providers depend on critical third parties: electronic health records, payroll systems, medication management software and managed service providers. When those suppliers are compromised, residents’ data, medication schedules, and staff rosters can be frozen overnight.

Yet most aged care organisations still rely on annual vendor due diligence questionnaires. This is a compliance checkbox that misses risks emerging in real time. That delay is untenable in an environment where attackers strike and spread within days.

To close the gap, aged care business leaders need to:

  • Prioritise critical vendors. Focus continuous monitoring on core systems - EHR, payroll, MSPs - where an outage would disrupt frontline care.
  • Demand live evidence. Proof of MFA, patch cadence, immutable backups, and incident playbooks should be collected continuously, not annually.
  • Pre-wire crisis response. Legal, regulatory, and board pathways must be rehearsed in advance. In aged care, a “pay in the dark” default risks both compliance and resident safety.

Vendor Risk Management for Aged Care: Protecting Residents from Cyber Threats

Aged care organisations are increasingly targeted by ransomware attacks that exploit third-party weaknesses. Gatekeeper, powered by LuminIQ AI Agents, enables boards and leadership teams to act under pressure, when fast, informed decisions are essential to protect both operations and residents.

With a unified platform, your business can:

  • Identify and block high-risk vendors before they access clinical systems
  • Maintain always-on compliance, with live tracking of insurance, credentials, and audit artefacts
  • Surface hidden vendor contract vulnerabilities, such as missing breach notification clauses or inadequate indemnities

Gatekeeper embeds resilience into every stage of the vendor relationship. As the only unified contract, spend and third-party risk management platform, it delivers the visibility and assurance boards now require and regulators demand when it comes to cybersecurity.

Challenge How Gatekeeper helps
Vendor blind spots: Risks surface only after a breach Unifies internal and external intelligence
to give aged care providers a single, actionable view of their third-party landscape. Risk signals, contractual obligations, and compliance gaps are surfaced early.
Cybersecurity clauses buried or missing in vendor contracts: Key obligations are overlooked Automated and guard-railed contract review processes identify missing or weak data protection, breach notifications, and indemnity clauses, enabling Legal and InfoSec to act early. 
Resident care disruption: Vendor incidents interrupt services Market IQ feeds live cyber risk signals into vendor records and triggers remedial workflows, notifying owners and boards to intervene early.
Credentials & insurance lapse (new): Expired COIs/licences create compliance gaps Track expiry dates, auto-chase vendors via a dedicated portal, route internal reviews, and automatically log a full audit trail. 
Audit fatigue: Evidence scattered across teams consumes hundreds of hours Instantly surfaces key clauses, compliance artefacts, and renewal data across your vendor contracts. Legal, Procurement, and Risk teams can answer audit queries in seconds, rather than hours.

 

Conclusion

The new Aged Care Act signals that cyber resilience is no longer optional. For boards, the obligation is clear: prove control across internal systems and third-party vendors.

Providers that delay will face regulatory sanction, reputational loss and operational disruption. Those that lead decisively will not only meet expectations but set a higher standard of trust and resident safety.

Gatekeeper gives care providers the monitoring and assurance to govern with confidence, satisfy regulators, and protect what matters most.

Book a demo today to see how Gatekeeper enables continuous vendor monitoring, perpetual audit readiness, and board-level assurance for aged care providers.

Rod Linsley
Rod Linsley

Rod is a seasoned Contracts Management and Procurement professional with a senior IT Management background, specialising in ICT contracts

Tags

Contract Management , Control , Vendor Management , Compliance , Contract Lifecycle Management , Contract Management Software , Visibility , Contract Lifecycle , Case Study , Vendor and Contract Lifecycle Management , Vendor Management Software , Supplier Management , Contract Management Strategy , Contract Risk Management , Regulation , Contract Repository , Risk Mitigation , Regulatory compliance , Third Party Risk Management , Contract Automation , Contract Visibility , VCLM , Procurement , TPRM , Workflows , Artificial Intelligence , CLM , Contract Ownership , Contract and vendor management , Contracts , NetSuite , Supplier Performance , Supplier Risk , contract renewals , Legal , Legal Ops , Podcast , Risk , Vendor Onboarding , Contract compliance , Financial Services , Future of Procurement , Gatekeeper Guides , Procurement Reimagined , Procurement Strategy , RFP , Supplier Relationships , Business continuity , CLM solutions , COVID-19 , Contract Managers , Contract Performance , Contract Redlining , Contract Review , Contract Risk , ESG , Metadata , Negotiation , SaaS , Supplier Management Software , Vendor Portal , Vendor risk , webinar , AI , Biotech , Clause Library , Contract Administration , Contract Approvals , Contract Management Plans , Cyber health , ESG Compliance , Kanban , Market IQ , RBAC , Recession Planning , SOC Reports , Security , SuiteWorld , Sustainable Procurement , collaboration , Audit preparedness , Audit readiness , Audits , Business Case , Clause Template , Contract Breach , Contract Governance , Contract Management Audit , Contract Management Automation , Contract Monitoring , Contract Obligations , Contract Outcomes , Contract Reporting , Contract Tracking , Contract Value , DORA , Dashboards , Data Fragmentation , Digital Transformation , Due Diligence , ECCTA , Employee Portal , Excel , FCA , ISO Certification , KPIs , Legal automation , LegalTech , Mergers and Acquisitions , Modern Slavery , Obligations Management , Office of the CFO , Partnerships , Procurement Planning , Redline , Scaling Business , Spend Analysis , Standard Contractual Clauses , SuiteApp , Suppler Management Software , Touchless Contracts , Vendor Relationship Management , Vendor risk management , central repository , success hours , time-to-contract , APRA CPS 230 , APRA CPS 234 , Australia , BCP , Bill S-211 , Breach of Contract , Brexit , Business Growth , CCPA , CMS , CPRA 2020 , CSR , Categorisation , Centralisation , Certifications , Cloud , Conferences , Confidentiality , Contract Ambiguity , Contract Analysis , Contract Approval , Contract Attributes , Contract Challenges , Contract Change Management , Contract Community , Contract Disengagement , Contract Disputes , Contract Drafting , Contract Economics , Contract Execution , Contract Intake , Contract Management Features , Contract Management Optimisation , Contract Management pain points , Contract Negotiation , Contract Obscurity , Contract Reminder Software , Contract Requests , Contract Routing , Contract Stratification , Contract Templates , Contract Termination , Contract Volatility , Contract relevance , Contract relevance review , Contracting Standards , Contracting Standards Review , Cyber security , DPW , DPW, Vendor and Contract Lifeycle Management, , Data Privacy , Data Sovereignty , Definitions , Disputes , EU , Electronic Signatures , Enterprise , Enterprise Contract Management , Financial Stability , Force Majeure , GDPR , Gatekeeper , Healthcare , ISO , IT , Implementation , Integrations , Intergrations , Key Contracts , Measurement , Microsoft Word , NDA , Operations , Parallel Approvals , Pharma , Planning , Port Agency , Pricing , RAG Status , Redlining , Redlining solutions , Requirements , SaaStock , Shipping , Spend optimzation , Startups , Supplier Cataloguing , Technology , Usability , Vendor Categorisation , Vendor Consolidation , Vendor Governance , Vendor Qualification , Vendor compliance , Vendor reporting , Voice of the CEO , automation , concentration risk , contract management processes , contract reminders , cyber risk , document automation , eSign , enterprise vendor management , esignature , post-signature , remote working , vendor centric , vendor lifecycle management

Related Content

 

subscribe to our newsletter

 

Sign up today to receive the latest GateKeeper content in your inbox.

Subscribe to Email Updates