<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=229461991482875&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
How CFOs Drive Success During VCLM Software Implementation
7:27

Investing in a Vendor and Contract Lifecycle Management (VCLM) platform is a strategic decision - but the true return for the business is realised only through successful implementation.

While CFOs won’t be configuring workflows or cleansing legacy data, their leadership is critical to ensuring that implementation aligns with financial strategy, delivers measurable value, and avoids common pitfalls that derail enterprise software rollouts.

This guide outlines the CFO’s role in VCLM implementation - what to oversee, where to influence, and how to maintain strategic momentum from initiation through to adoption and optimisation.

What is The CFO’s Role in Vendor and contract Management software Implementation?

CFOs often sponsor VCLM initiatives, and their involvement extends far beyond approving budget.

They ensure that implementation stays aligned with business priorities and that expected outcomes - like cost control, risk mitigation and operational visibility - are delivered.

  • Framing the Financial Case: CFOs are uniquely positioned to communicate the financial rationale behind VCLM implementation. By reiterating expected cost savings, risk reduction and compliance benefits, they help reinforce executive alignment from the rest of the board. 
  • Embedding Accountability: Implementation isn’t just a technology project. It impacts Legal, Procurement, Compliance, Finance and IT. CFOs must facilitate collaboration with and between these stakeholders, clarify ownership of deliverables, and ensure that key implementation milestones are met.
  • Linking to Strategic Outcomes: Whether the goal is reducing audit burden, streamlining spend controls or accelerating time-to-contract, CFOs should ensure that implementation goals are clearly tied to strategic business outcomes and measured accordingly.

The CFO’s influence is felt not in tactical delivery, but in securing enterprise alignment, reinforcing accountability, and maintaining focus on value.

 

Pre-Implementation Planning: Setting the Stage for Success

CFOs don’t need to manage project plans, but they must ensure the right foundations are in place. This includes:

1. Defining Success

Support Procurement and Legal teams in setting clear targets linked to enterprise outcomes, such as:

  • Reduction in contract cycle times
  • Number of contracts centralised
  • Missed renewal rate improvement
  • Time savings in reporting and audit preparation
  • Compliance audit pass rates.

2. Prioritising Use Cases

Align with affected departments to prioritise high-impact workflows such as:

  • Contract approvals and signature workflows
  • Vendor onboarding and due diligence
  • Renewal management and alerts
  • Risk flagging and clause extraction.

3. Supporting Data Preparedness

Legacy contract data is often messy. Ensure resources are allocated to clean and standardise metadata for migration and push for collaboration with the vendor to do it right.

4. Aligning Resourcing

Assign internal champions and process owners. Decide whether to pursue a guided (internally-led, vendor-assisted) or managed (vendor-led) implementation based on capacity and internal expertise.

Screenshot 2024-07-03 at 15.33.50

Managing Change and Driving Adoption

Implementing just technology alone won’t transform a business’s vendor and contract management.

Change management must be at the core of an implementation strategy. This requires the CFO to:

  • Communicate the ‘Why’ Clearly and Frequently: Explain how the VCLM software supports compliance, controls costs, and simplifies processes. Tie these messages back to the CFO’s original business case.
  • Appoint a Software Champion: Designate a cross-functional champion with both software literacy and business acumen. They’ll help drive adoption, troubleshoot issues, and ensure individual departmental goals are met.
  • Use Feedback Loops and Iterative Improvements: Collect feedback regularly and refine VCLM workflows based on user experience. This continuous improvement model ensures relevance and usability, enhancing trust in the process.
  • Celebrate Quick Wins: Recognise milestones such as first contract executed via the VCLM platform, or successful audit enabled by the system. Public success stories help boost morale and adoption.

Adoption is not a one-time event but an ongoing effort. CFOs can play a key role in fostering a culture of openness, adaptability and engagement, making sure the platform becomes a tool people rely on, not resist.

Measuring Success: The CFO’s Implementation Dashboard

VCLM Platform KPIS for CFOs

Once the platform is live, CFOs must track performance against key outcomes based on:

1. Operational Efficiency Metrics

These reflect how well the platform is streamlining day-to-day processes. A decline in manual workload, faster contract turnaround, and higher user adoption provide evidence that the system is delivering functional value. Useful measures include:

  • % reduction in manual tasks
  • Average contract turnaround time
  • System adoption rates by department.

2. Financial Impact Metrics

Tracking financial outcomes reveals the platform’s contribution to the bottom line. The following indicators help CFOs evaluate whether VCLM is delivering promised savings and preventing value leakage:

  • Reduction in contract leakage or unplanned renewals
  • Cost savings from renegotiated contracts
  • Audit readiness time improvements.

3. Risk and Compliance Metrics

These figures showcase how well the platform is supporting governance and risk mitigation. Faster response times and proactive alerts indicate a mature, compliance-friendly VCLM environment using measures like:

  • % of contracts with assigned risk scores
  • Number of contracts with automated alerts or controls
  • Time to respond to regulatory inquiries.

These KPIs help demonstrate ROI and guide ongoing optimisation.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Even well-intentioned rollouts can stumble or lose focus. CFOs should watch for these red flags:

  • Lack of Executive Visibility: Without ongoing C-suite involvement, VCLM can be perceived as a back-office initiative.
  • Neglecting Integration: Siloed systems limit the reach of contract data and reduce reporting quality.
  • Over-customisation: Resist unnecessary tailoring that complicates software updates or creates dependency on external developers.
  • Underestimating Change Management: Poor communication and training lead to resistance and low adoption.

Awareness of common missteps helps CFOs steer their organisations toward smoother implementations. By championing integration, supporting change management, and maintaining visibility, they safeguard long-term platform success.

Conclusion

Choosing a VCLM platform is a critical step, but delivering the real value relies on how it’s implemented. CFOs have a unique role to play in aligning the project with financial strategy, ensuring governance and maximising adoption.By leading from the front, facilitating stakeholder engagement and collaboration, measuring the right outcomes, and fostering a culture of continuous improvement, CFOs can ensure their VCLM investment becomes a long-term enabler of vendor and contract visibility, control, compliance and cost efficiency.

Ready to realise the full ROI of VCLM? Schedule a Gatekeeper demo today and discover how our implementation experts help CFOs turn vision into value.

Rod Linsley
Rod Linsley

Rod is a seasoned Contracts Management and Procurement professional with a senior IT Management background, specialising in ICT contracts

Tags

Contract Management , Control , Vendor Management , Compliance , Contract Lifecycle Management , Contract Management Software , Visibility , Contract Lifecycle , Case Study , Vendor and Contract Lifecycle Management , Vendor Management Software , Supplier Management , Contract Management Strategy , Contract Risk Management , Regulation , Contract Repository , Risk Mitigation , Regulatory compliance , Third Party Risk Management , Contract Automation , Contract Visibility , VCLM , Procurement , TPRM , Workflows , Artificial Intelligence , CLM , Contract Ownership , Contract and vendor management , Contracts , NetSuite , Supplier Performance , Supplier Risk , contract renewals , Legal , Legal Ops , Podcast , Risk , Vendor Onboarding , Contract compliance , Financial Services , Future of Procurement , Gatekeeper Guides , Procurement Reimagined , Procurement Strategy , RFP , Supplier Relationships , Business continuity , CLM solutions , COVID-19 , Contract Managers , Contract Performance , Contract Redlining , Contract Review , Contract Risk , ESG , Metadata , Negotiation , SaaS , Supplier Management Software , Vendor Portal , Vendor risk , webinar , AI , Biotech , Clause Library , Contract Administration , Contract Approvals , Contract Management Plans , Cyber health , ESG Compliance , Kanban , Market IQ , RBAC , Recession Planning , SOC Reports , Security , SuiteWorld , Sustainable Procurement , collaboration , Audit preparedness , Audit readiness , Audits , Business Case , Clause Template , Contract Breach , Contract Governance , Contract Management Audit , Contract Management Automation , Contract Monitoring , Contract Obligations , Contract Outcomes , Contract Reporting , Contract Tracking , Contract Value , DORA , Dashboards , Data Fragmentation , Digital Transformation , Due Diligence , ECCTA , Employee Portal , Excel , FCA , ISO Certification , KPIs , Legal automation , LegalTech , Mergers and Acquisitions , Modern Slavery , Obligations Management , Office of the CFO , Partnerships , Procurement Planning , Redline , Scaling Business , Spend Analysis , Standard Contractual Clauses , SuiteApp , Suppler Management Software , Touchless Contracts , Vendor Relationship Management , Vendor risk management , central repository , success hours , time-to-contract , APRA CPS 230 , APRA CPS 234 , Australia , BCP , Bill S-211 , Breach of Contract , Brexit , Business Growth , CCPA , CMS , CPRA 2020 , CSR , Categorisation , Centralisation , Certifications , Cloud , Conferences , Confidentiality , Contract Ambiguity , Contract Analysis , Contract Approval , Contract Attributes , Contract Challenges , Contract Change Management , Contract Community , Contract Disengagement , Contract Disputes , Contract Drafting , Contract Economics , Contract Execution , Contract Intake , Contract Management Features , Contract Management Optimisation , Contract Management pain points , Contract Negotiation , Contract Obscurity , Contract Reminder Software , Contract Requests , Contract Routing , Contract Stratification , Contract Templates , Contract Termination , Contract Volatility , Contract relevance , Contract relevance review , Contracting Standards , Contracting Standards Review , Cyber security , DPW , DPW, Vendor and Contract Lifeycle Management, , Data Privacy , Data Sovereignty , Definitions , Disputes , EU , Electronic Signatures , Enterprise , Enterprise Contract Management , Financial Stability , Force Majeure , GDPR , Gatekeeper , Healthcare , ISO , IT , Implementation , Integrations , Intergrations , Key Contracts , Measurement , Microsoft Word , NDA , Operations , Parallel Approvals , Pharma , Planning , Port Agency , Pricing , RAG Status , Redlining , Redlining solutions , Requirements , SaaStock , Shipping , Spend optimzation , Startups , Supplier Cataloguing , Technology , Usability , Vendor Categorisation , Vendor Consolidation , Vendor Governance , Vendor Qualification , Vendor compliance , Vendor reporting , Voice of the CEO , automation , concentration risk , contract management processes , contract reminders , cyber risk , document automation , eSign , enterprise vendor management , esignature , post-signature , remote working , vendor centric , vendor lifecycle management

Related Content

 

subscribe to our newsletter

 

Sign up today to receive the latest GateKeeper content in your inbox.

Subscribe to Email Updates