<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=229461991482875&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

There is a range of solutions on the market today that can digitise the entire contract negotiation and redline process online. This is a seemingly very valuable solution to a very real problem.

These solutions take the accepted legal and commercial standard that is Microsoft Word and ‘Track Changes’ and replicate this feature-set in a web-based application.

MS Word Track Changes Menu

These third-party redline solutions allow you to move fully online - to take fragmented processes and centrally manage them, consolidating both internal users and external users into one smooth trackable workflow.

Perfect! This almost sounds too good to be true. Sorry, it is.

Let’s consider a few scenarios from the lawyers’ perspective:

There is a major contract that needs redlining. The contract value is high value. The CEO wants it done - today. You are responsible for ensuring your business is protected. It’s late.

You receive a link, from third-party redline solution, that has ‘Track Changes’-like features built in. It’s not Microsoft Word.

  • Are you going to log in and use this new system and hope it works like Word?
  • Are you going to trust this?
  • Are you going to potentially risk your job to use some other company’s new toy?

No, no and no.

This is just one of many examples of the seductive trap of these solutions.

What legal counsel wants to trial a new solution at the expense of risk to their own business?

Let’s consider another scenario:

A large complex contract is undergoing a redline process. There is a hard deadline (let’s face it when isn’t there?).

You receive a link to an online solution that has redlining built in. It’s not using Microsoft Word.

OK let’s give this a go. The only problem is the deadline is an hour after you get off a 3-hour flight.

Are you going to wait until you get to the other side so you can work or use the time on the flight to get the job done in Word - the solution you have always used, know and trust?


Wait, this third party redline solution allows you to upload a Word version and it will take all your changes and apply them. Perfect! You can work on the plane in Word and then just upload all your complex changes.

Mmmm….are you sure all your changes will be tracked?
What if they are not?
Will you need to do this again online?
Can you just tell your boss you like new technology so decided to use this solution instead of prioritising the company’s exposure and risk?

I think not.

Why is this so hard?

Microsoft Word was released in 1983 and there have been more than 35 versions released across different operating systems.

Almost all companies lag behind the latest version, adhering to corporate IT policies that prioritise security and stability over the latest features and versions.

Some organisations, particularly public sector bodies, are running versions of Windows and Word that are over six years old.

In most negotiations, the parties will be using different versions of Word. Maintaining compatibility with these versions for a feature as complex as Word Track Changes is incredibly difficult. Doing this online is almost impossible.

Want further proof?

As you may know, Microsoft provides Word online as part of their Office365 suite. But did you know that Microsoft does not support Word Track Changes online?

That’s right, Microsoft cannot support their own feature online, despite having one of the largest development teams on the planet

If Microsoft invented Word track changes and they don’t support this online should you trust a third party that says they can? [Click to Tweet]

So do we need to stick with a fragmented process using emails and no central management?

No. Instead, you can use eNegotiate from Gatekeeper.

Our solution that allows you to work with Microsoft Word and track changes natively. It also allows you to generate unlimited Microsoft Word® templates from contract records, automate the generation of compliant legal agreements and track all changes against contract document and records through a visual audit trail. 

eNegotiate-Word-Track-Changes-3Redline contracts with Gatekeeper

If you would like to see eNegotiate in action, get it touch with us today to arrange a demonstration. 

In the meantime, here's the second of our articles on the danger of using third-party solutions for redlining contracts

Patrick O'Connor
Patrick O'Connor

Patrick is CEO of Gatekeeper, with years of contract and commercial negotiation expertise, predominantly in IT and Technology.


Contract Management , Contract Lifecycle Management , Vendor Management , Contract Lifecycle , Contract Management Software , Case Study , Supplier Management , CLM , Contracts , Risk Mitigation , Contract Automation , Contract Ownership , Risk , Contract Management Strategy , Contract Risk Management , Gatekeeper Guides , Legal , Negotiation , Vendor Management Software , COVID-19 , Contract Redlining , Legal Ops , RFP , Workflows , Artificial Intelligence , Business continuity , Compliance , Contract Repository , Vendor Onboarding , AI , CLM solutions , Clause Library , Contract Administration , Contract Management Plans , Contract Managers , Contract Performance , Contract Risk , Electronic Signatures , Excel , Kanban , Metadata , Procurement Strategy , RBAC , Redline , SaaS , Security , Spend Analysis , Supplier Performance , Vendor Portal , collaboration , contract renewals , Clause Template , Contract Approvals , Contract Breach , Contract Governance , Contract Monitoring , Contract Outcomes , Contract Review , Contract Templates , Contract Tracking , Dashboards , Data Fragmentation , Employee Portal , Gatekeeper , IT , KPIs , Obligations Management , Procurement Planning , Scaling Business , Suppler Management Software , Sustainable Procurement , automation , central repository , eSign , time-to-contract , webinar , Australia , BCP , Breach of Contract , Brexit , Business Case , Business Growth , CCPA , CMS , CSR , Categorisation , Certifications , Cloud , Conferences , Confidentiality , Contract Ambiguity , Contract Analysis , Contract Community , Contract Disputes , Contract Drafting , Contract Economics , Contract Execution , Contract Management Audit , Contract Obligations , Contract Obscurity , Contract Routing , Contract Stratification , Contract Value , Contract Volatility , Contract compliance , Contracting Standards , Contracting Standards Review , Data Privacy , Data Sovereignty , Definitions , Digital Transformation , Disputes , ESG , EU , Enterprise , Enterprise Contract Management , FCA , Financial Services , Force Majeure , GDPR , Hotels , ISO , ISO Certification , Implementation , Intergrations , Key Contracts , Measurement , Mergers and Acquisitions , Modern Slavery , NDA , Operations , Parallel Approvals , Partnerships , Pharma , Planning , Port Agency , Pricing , Procurement , RAG Status , Recession Planning , Regulation , Regulatory compliance , Requirements , SOC Reports , SaaStock , Shipping , Spend optimzation , Startups , Technology , Touchless Contracts , Usability , Vendor risk , remote working , vendor centric

Related Content


subscribe to our newsletter


Sign up today to receive the latest GateKeeper content in your inbox.

Subscribe to Email Updates