<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=229461991482875&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Skip to content
Back
Third-Party Risk Onboarding Forms: Standardise for Success
9:02

Third-party risk management is both a business-critical function and a regulatory requirement.

The vendors, suppliers, and partners you bring into the organisation can either strengthen your operations or quietly introduce risk.

For procurement leaders, the challenge lies in balancing the pressure to move quickly with the responsibility to safeguard the business.

Standardising how you assess and onboard these third parties is the first step to reducing risk, avoiding costly compliance failures, and streamlining your vendor management process.

Done well, it shifts procurement from reactive firefighting to proactive control, ensuring the organisation moves quickly without sacrificing compliance or visibility.

 

The Rising Cost of Third-Party Risk?

The numbers speak for themselves:

For compliance-centric organisations, inconsistent vendor assessments don’t just create operational headaches - they open the door to regulatory fines, reputational damage, and financial loss.

They also drain resources internally. Teams get stuck in cycles of rework, audits turn into fire drills, and procurement is left firefighting issues that should have been controlled from the start.

Standardising how vendors are assessed closes that door. It reduces exposure, protects reputation, and ensures that every third party is held to the same standard - assuring leaders that risk is managed consistently across the business.

The Problem with Self-Made Forms

Many organisations still rely on homegrown questionnaires to assess vendor risk. They look simple on the surface, but they hide serious flaws.

  • Inconsistency: Different teams build their own forms. The result is uneven assessments and dangerous gaps.
  • Poor alignment: Self-made templates rarely map cleanly to recognised standards like ISO 27001, NIST, or GDPR. When regulators review them, they don’t stand up.
  • High maintenance costs: Every regulatory change necessitates a manual rewrite, and updates often arrive long after the rules have been revised.
  • Subjectivity: Without scoring, assessments are open to interpretation. That makes results unreliable and vendor comparisons almost impossible.

This patchwork approach may cope with a handful of vendors. But it doesn’t scale against the realities of tightening regulations and expanding supply chains.

What feels manageable today can quickly become a source of exposure, and the cost of failure only grows as the number of third parties increases.

That’s why many organisations look to standardisation. And in third-party risk, one benchmark stands above the rest: SIG, the Standardised Information Gathering Questionnaire.

Standardisation with Standardised Information Gathering (SIG): The Industry Benchmark

The Standardised Information Gathering (SIG) Questionnaire, developed by the Shared Assessments community, is the leading standard for third-party risk assessments.

Why SIG?

  • Structured and modular: Tailor assessments to vendor type and risk level.
  • Mapped to regulations: Covers 21 risk domains, aligned with 31+ global frameworks.
  • Continuously updated: Annual updates reflect evolving laws and threat landscapes.
  • Widely recognised: Adopted by enterprises and platforms globally, enabling comparability.

With SIG, compliance teams gain a trusted, regulator-ready foundation for vendor risk onboarding.

What are the benefits of standardisation?

  • Consistency: Every vendor is measured against the same yardstick, removing gaps and subjectivity.
  • Defensibility: Assessments that can stand up to regulators, auditors, and the board.
  • Comparability: Results that can be tracked over time and benchmarked across vendors.
  • Efficiency: A repeatable process that frees teams from chasing or rewriting forms.
  • Visibility: Clear data that gives procurement control, compliance confidence, and finance predictability.

Without standardisation, vendor assessments remain fragmented and reactive. With the SIG Questionnaire, organisations can scale onboarding without scaling risk - building resilience in the face of expanding supply chains, shifting regulations, and increasing scrutiny.

Going Further: The Power of Scored Forms

Standardised questionnaires lay the groundwork. But to truly manage risk at scale, you need more than a checklist.

That’s where Scored Forms come in.

They turn assessments into measurable data - giving procurement, compliance, and finance a shared view of vendor risk that can be acted on.

Screenshot 2025-10-03 at 10.25.40

Benefits of Scored Forms:

  • Quantify risk: Apply weights and scores to responses to produce a clear overall risk rating.
  • Automate triage: Fast-track low-risk vendors to expedite onboarding, while escalating high-risk ones for more thorough review.
  • Monitor over time: Track how vendor risk scores evolve across reviews, audits, and contracts.
  • Remove subjectivity: Consistent scoring eliminates reviewer bias and builds defensibility.
  • Drive decisions: Risk scores feed dashboards, workflows, and board reports - providing leaders the visibility they need to act with confidence.

In Gatekeeper, Scored Forms take SIG questionnaires and transform them into dynamic, weighted assessments.

Instead of static compliance checklists, you get proactive risk management - where data backs every vendor decision, and every risk call is defensible at the highest level.

Dimension

With SIG Standardisation

With Scored Forms Added

Consistency

One standard form across all vendors

Same scoring logic across reviewers

Comparability

Benchmark vendors side by side

Risk ratings highlight differences

Efficiency

Save time vs. DIY forms

Automated scoring speeds onboarding

Decision Support

Data centralised in one place

Risk thresholds trigger workflows

Compliance

Always updated with SIG releases

Full audit trail of scores & changes

 

How Gatekeeper Customers Use Scored Forms for Vendor Risk Management

Police Bank wanted vendor management to be proactive, not reactive. Too often, issues like SLA failures, cyber events, or privacy lapses were only surfaced after the fact - when they were already creating risk.

With Scored Forms in Gatekeeper, they establish a simple discipline. Each month, contract owners receive a prompt to complete a five-question check for their vendors. Every question carries a weighting. Answers generate a numeric score and a red, amber, or green status.

The questions focus on the risks that matter most:

  • SLA adherence: have service levels been met?
  • Cyber/security incidents: have there been any breaches?
  • Privacy and data protection posture

Overall vendor performance and compliance, including regulatory requirements like CPS 230.

The scores build a timeline of performance. Trends are easy to spot. If a vendor moves from green to amber or amber to red, the team is notified early and can intervene with the contract owner or vendor before the problem escalates.


The business impact is clear:

  • Faster, self-serve access to vendor evidence and status
  • Less time wasted by procurement, freeing capacity for strategic priorities like RFPs and escalations
  • A stronger procurement culture, with greater stakeholder buy

By using Scored Forms, Police Bank now has a proactive, data-driven rhythm for vendor management. What was once reactive firefighting is now a disciplined, transparent process that builds confidence with both procurement and leadership.

Gatekeeper Advantage: SIG + Scored Forms, Built-In

Every Gatekeeper subscription comes with:

  • Access to SIG questionnaires with annual updates
  • Gatekeeper’s Scored Forms module, converting responses into risk ratings automatically

That means you can start using industry-standard forms immediately, while also benefiting from automated scoring, streamlined workflows, and actionable insights.

👉 Explore SIG here: https://sharedassessments.org/sig/

👉 Contact us today for a demo and see Gatekeeper’s Scored Forms in action

Conclusion

Third-party risk is a reality. The choice is how you manage it.

DIY forms leave you exposed - inconsistent, subjective, and impossible to defend at scale.

SIG questionnaires bring structure, consistency, and regulatory alignment.

Scored Forms turn assessments into data - unlocking efficiency, comparability, and proactive decision-making.

With Gatekeeper, you don’t have to compromise. We take you from standardised SIG questionnaires to scored, automated risk assessments - giving procurement speed, compliance confidence, and the CFO the predictability they need.

Patrick O'Connor
Patrick O'Connor

Patrick is CEO of Gatekeeper, with over two decades of contract and commercial negotiation expertise, predominantly in IT and Technology.

Tags

Contract Management , Control , Vendor Management , Compliance , Contract Lifecycle Management , Contract Management Software , Visibility , Contract Lifecycle , Case Study , Vendor and Contract Lifecycle Management , Vendor Management Software , Supplier Management , Contract Management Strategy , Contract Risk Management , Regulation , Contract Repository , Risk Mitigation , Regulatory compliance , Third Party Risk Management , Contract Automation , Contract Visibility , VCLM , Procurement , TPRM , Workflows , Artificial Intelligence , CLM , Contract Ownership , Contract and vendor management , Contracts , NetSuite , Supplier Performance , Supplier Risk , contract renewals , Legal , Legal Ops , Podcast , Risk , Vendor Onboarding , Contract compliance , Financial Services , Future of Procurement , Gatekeeper Guides , Procurement Reimagined , Procurement Strategy , RFP , Supplier Relationships , Business continuity , CLM solutions , COVID-19 , Contract Managers , Contract Performance , Contract Redlining , Contract Review , Contract Risk , ESG , Metadata , Negotiation , SaaS , Supplier Management Software , Vendor Portal , Vendor risk , webinar , AI , Biotech , Clause Library , Contract Administration , Contract Approvals , Contract Management Plans , Cyber health , ESG Compliance , Kanban , Market IQ , RBAC , Recession Planning , SOC Reports , Security , SuiteWorld , Sustainable Procurement , collaboration , Audit preparedness , Audit readiness , Audits , Business Case , Clause Template , Contract Breach , Contract Governance , Contract Management Audit , Contract Management Automation , Contract Monitoring , Contract Obligations , Contract Outcomes , Contract Reporting , Contract Tracking , Contract Value , DORA , Dashboards , Data Fragmentation , Digital Transformation , Due Diligence , ECCTA , Employee Portal , Excel , FCA , ISO Certification , KPIs , Legal automation , LegalTech , Mergers and Acquisitions , Modern Slavery , Obligations Management , Office of the CFO , Partnerships , Procurement Planning , Redline , Scaling Business , Spend Analysis , Standard Contractual Clauses , SuiteApp , Suppler Management Software , Touchless Contracts , Vendor Relationship Management , Vendor risk management , central repository , success hours , time-to-contract , APRA CPS 230 , APRA CPS 234 , Australia , BCP , Bill S-211 , Breach of Contract , Brexit , Business Growth , CCPA , CMS , CPRA 2020 , CSR , Categorisation , Centralisation , Certifications , Cloud , Conferences , Confidentiality , Contract Ambiguity , Contract Analysis , Contract Approval , Contract Attributes , Contract Challenges , Contract Change Management , Contract Community , Contract Disengagement , Contract Disputes , Contract Drafting , Contract Economics , Contract Execution , Contract Intake , Contract Management Features , Contract Management Optimisation , Contract Management pain points , Contract Negotiation , Contract Obscurity , Contract Reminder Software , Contract Requests , Contract Routing , Contract Stratification , Contract Templates , Contract Termination , Contract Volatility , Contract relevance , Contract relevance review , Contracting Standards , Contracting Standards Review , Cyber security , DPW , DPW, Vendor and Contract Lifeycle Management, , Data Privacy , Data Sovereignty , Definitions , Disputes , EU , Electronic Signatures , Enterprise , Enterprise Contract Management , Financial Stability , Force Majeure , GDPR , Gatekeeper , Healthcare , ISO , IT , Implementation , Integrations , Intergrations , Key Contracts , Measurement , Microsoft Word , NDA , Operations , Parallel Approvals , Pharma , Planning , Port Agency , Pricing , RAG Status , Redlining , Redlining solutions , Requirements , SaaStock , Shipping , Spend optimzation , Startups , Supplier Cataloguing , Technology , Usability , Vendor Categorisation , Vendor Consolidation , Vendor Governance , Vendor Qualification , Vendor compliance , Vendor reporting , Voice of the CEO , automation , concentration risk , contract management processes , contract reminders , cyber risk , document automation , eSign , enterprise vendor management , esignature , post-signature , remote working , vendor centric , vendor lifecycle management

Related Content

 

subscribe to our newsletter

 

Sign up today to receive the latest GateKeeper content in your inbox.

Subscribe to Email Updates